p. 331−342
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4
0.76), unfiltered panoramic, and filtered panoramic, respectively. General agreement between the two observers in terms of depth of caries was higher for panoramic views than bitewing radiography. Conclusion: According to the results of this study digital panoramic imaging, in spite of its digital imaging which the manufacturer claims can increase diagnostic accuracy, cannot be as accurate as bitewing radiography in detection of proximal caries. Thus, bitewing radiography is always the best option for evaluation of proximal surfaces.]]>
p. 343−353
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4
p. 354−362
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4
p. 366−372
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4
p. 374−386
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4
p. 387−394
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4
p. 395−404
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4
p. 405−417
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4
p. 418−424
2008-2843
Vol.20/No.4