The Effect of Trait Anxiety and Induced Anxiety on the Updating of Working Memory Function

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Psychology, School of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khoramabad, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Educational and Psychology, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Educational and Psychology, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

Background & Aims:The aim of the present study was to use a psychological model to explain the effect of trait anxiety and induced anxiety on individual’s performance in updating function of working memory. This study was also designed to test attentional control theory of Eysenck et al.
Methods: Throngh Multistage Cluster sampling method, 330 freshman university students were asked to complete the trait part of Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventor. After scoring, 24 subjects from the upper 25 percent of distribution were selected as high trait anxiety group, and 24 subjects from the lower 25 percent of distribution were selected as low trait anxiety group.Then, the subjects were tested in normal and induced anxiety conditions. The performance in updating function was investigated with both of processing efficacy and performance effectiveness. Data were analyzed using mixed repeated measures, modified bone ferreni post hoc test and independent t- test.
Results: The results showed the effect of trait anxiety on processing efficacy in updating function of working memory. Also, in addition to processing efficacy, performance effectiveness was impaired in the induced anxiety condition.
Conclusion: The results provided support for attentional control theory of Eysenck et al; That is, the high trait anxiety group increased their effort in order to maintain levels of performance. The high trait anxiety group, in addition to increasing mental effort, had lower cognitive function in the induced anxiety condition.

Keywords


  1. Northern JJ. Anxiety and cognitive performance: A test of predictions made by cognitive interference theory and attentional control theory. Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2010
  2. Lezak MD. Verbal Fluency, Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd ed., 1995;
  3. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford university press, 2004.
  4. Cheraghi F, Moradi AR, Farahani MN. The effect of trait anxiety and stressful conditions on the processing efficiency and working memory performance. J Behavioral sciences 2008; 2(1): 25-32 [In Persian].
  5. Eysenck MW, Calvo MG. Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion 1992; 6(6):409-34.
  6. Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Pierce GR. Anxiety, cognitive interference, and performance. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality 1990; 5(2): 1-18.
  7. Eysenck MW, Derakshan N, Santos R, Calvo MG. Anxiety and cognitive performance: Attentional control theroy. Emotion 2007; 7(2): 336-53.
  8. Derakshan N, Smyth S, Eysenck MW. Effects of state anxiety on performance using a task-switching paradigm: An investigation of attentional control theory. Psychon Bull Rev 2009; 16(6): 1112-7.
  9. Baddeley A. Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1996; 49(1): 5-28.
  10. Morris N, Jones DM. Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive. British Journal of Psychology 1990; 81(10): 111-21.
  11. Zhang T, Mou D, Wang C, Tan F, Jiang Y, Lijun Z, Li H. Dopamine and executive function: Increased spontaneous eye blink rates correlate with better set-shifting and inhibition, but poorer updating. Int J Psychophysiol 2015; 96(3): 155-61.
  12. Botto M, Basso D, Ferrari M, Palladino P. When working memory updating requires updating: Analysis of serial position in a running memory task. Acta psychologica 2014; 148: 123-9.
  13. Lendínez C, Pelegrina S, Lechuga MT. Age differences in working memory updating: The role of interference, focus switching and substituting information. Acta psychologica 2015; 157: 106-13.
  14. Kizilbash AH, Vanderploeg RD, Curtiss G. The effects of depression and anxiety on memory performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2002; 17(1): 57-67.
  15. Visu-Petra L, Cheie L, Benga O, Miclea M. Cognitive control goes to school: The impact of executive functions on academic performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011; 11: 240-4.
  16. Derakshan N, Ansari TL, Hansard M, Shoker L, Eysenck MW. Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the antisaccade task. Exp psychol 2009; 56(1): 48-55.
  17. Berggren N, Derakshan N. Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: why you see them and why you don’t. Biol Psychol 2013; 92(3): 440-6.
  18. Palladino P, Cornoldi C, De Beni R, Pazzaglia F. Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Mem Cognit 2001; 29(2): 344-54.
  19. Carretti B, Cornoldi C, De Beni R, Palladino P. What happens to information to be suppressed in working‐memory tasks? Short and long term effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004; 57(6): 1059-84.
  20. Zijlstra AR. Efficiency in work behaviour: A design approach for modern tools. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, 1993;.
  21. Horwitz JE, McCaffrey RJ. Effects of a third party observer and anxiety on tests of executive function. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2008; 23(4): 409-17.