Abutment fracture and the technique Used to Remove the fracture portion of the Abutmet: Case Report

Document Type: Case Report

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Associate professor, kerman Oral Diseases Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Abstract

This clinical report presents a case of abutment fracture, due to occlusal overload, occurred with an implant-supported restoration on right mandibular first molar of a female patient. After 6 months of prosthetic reconstruction implants, the patient returned to the clinic due to the loss of implant crown. The fractured fragment of the abutment with the screw protective cotton had remained within the crown of the first molar. A periapical radiograph was taken, which revealed that the base portion of the abutment had remained within the internal hex of the fixture.  After removing the abutment screw, the base portion of the fractured abutment did not move due to the close connection and the presence of Morse taper. After applying the methods explained in previous studies, an ultrasonic tip was used counterclockwise to remove the base segment of the implant. The fractured segment of the implant was removed without destroying the implant. Various factors are responsible for the fracture of abutments, including excessive occlusal forces, implant position, implant diameter, inadequate prosthetic adjustment, prosthesis design, metal fatigue, manufacturing defects and galvanic activity. This paper explains the reasons for abutment fractures and a novel technique used to remove the fractured portion.
 

Keywords


  1. Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Fernandes-Neto AJ, Neves FD. Management of fractured dental implants: a case report. Implant Dent 2009; 18(1):10-16.
  2. Al Quran FA, Rashan BA, Al-Dwairi ZN. Management of dental implant fractures: A case history. J Oral Implantol 2009; 35(4):210-14.
  3. Alssadi G, Quirynen M, Komerek A, van Steenberghe D. Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failure, up to abutment connection. J Clin Periodontol 2007; 34(7):610-17.
  4. McDermott NE, Chuang SK, Woo VV, Dodson TB. Complications of dental implants: identification, frequency, and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18(6):848-55.
  5. Gargallo Albiol J, Satorres-Nieto M, Puyuelo Capablo JL, Sanchez Garcés MA, Pi Urgell J, Gay Escoda C. Endosseous dental implant fractures: an analysis of 21 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008; 13: 124-28.
  6. DiPede L, Alhashim A, Vaidyanathan TK, Flinton R. Fracture resistance of soft tissue level implants after cyclic loading and external modification. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109(1):30-6.
  7. Mangano C, Piattelli A, Mortellaro C, Mangano F, Perrotti V, Iezzi G. Evaluation of peri-implant bone response in implants retrieved for fracture after more than 20 years of loading: A case series. J Oral Implantol 2015; 21; 41(4): 414-18.
  8. Mish C.E. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 2nd ed., Saint Louis, Elsevier, 2015; pp. 296, 309, 365-366.
  9. Bhandari S, Aggarwal N, Bakshi S. Ultrasonic Oscillations for Conservative Retrieval of a Rare Fracture of Implant Healing Abutment. J Oral Implantol 2013; 39(4):475-8.
  10. Roe P, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Won JB. Retrieval of a Fractured Zirconia Implant Abutment Using a clinical report. J Prosthodont 2011; 20(4) 315-18.
  11. Balshi TJ. An analysis and management of fractured implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11(5):660-6.
  12. Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3(3):104-11.
  13. Tagger Green N, Machtei EE, Horowitz J, Peled M. Fracture of dental implants: literature review and report of a case. Implant Dent 2002; 11(2):137-43.
  14. Tosun T, Karabuda C, Cuhadaroglu C. Evaluation of sleep bruxism by polysomnographic analysis in patients with dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18(2): 286-92.
  15. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10(3): 326-33.
  16. Conrad HJ, Schulte JK, Vallee MC. Fractures Related To Occlusal Overload With Single Posterior Implants: A Clinical Report. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99(4): 251-6.
  17. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Cal E, Ow RK. Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15(5):662-7.
  18. Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics: current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15(1):66-75.
  19. Levine RA, Clem DS 3rd, Wilson TG Jr, Higginbottom F, Solnit G. Multicenter Retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: Results of loading for 2 or more years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14(4): 516-20.
  20. Patterson EA, Johns RB. Theoretical analysis of the fatigue of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7(1): 26-33.
  21. Thulasidas S, Givan DA, Lemons JE, O'Neal SJ, Ramp LC, Liu PR. Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments. J Prosthodont 2015; 24(2):127-35.