Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Orthodontics, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Orthodontics, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

4 Dentist, Qazvin, Iran

Abstract

Background: Unusual enlargement of nasopharynx can disrupt air flow through the nose. The aim of this study was to investigate the cephalometric parameters in the upper airways.
Methods: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 32 adults with Class II malocclusion without the history of night apnea in Qazvin. The radiographs were obtained from the archives in Qazvin Orthodontics Department and private clinics. The selected radiographs were entered into the computer and measured by two observers using Foxit reader version 3. Then, according to the criteria in the Lieberg analysis, the average size of the variables related to the upper airways was determined as the final size. Coefficient of variations and Pearson correlation were calculated in SPSS.
Results: There was a significant positive correlation between tongue length and height and soft palate length and also between tongue length and vertical position of the vallecula (p <0.01). But there was a significant negative correlation between nasopharyngeal air space and hypopharyngeal air space, vertical and horizontal position of vallecula (p <0.01). Nasopharyngeal air space showed a significant positive correlation with posterior air space but a negative correlation with soft palate length (p <0.001). There was also a significant positive correlation between soft palate length and maximum thickness of soft palate, while the length of contact between the dorsal surface of the tongue and soft palate showed a significant negative correlation with vertical position of the vallecula (p <0.004).
Conclusion: Cephalometric parameters of upper airways were not significantly different in adults with CLII malocclusion in Qazvin.
 

Keywords

  1. Iran: Orthodontics. Available from:http://www.iranhealers.com/dentist/ppl02b_2.asp.htm, Accessed date: 2015 Jun 1.
  2. Iran: Orthodontics. Available From: http:// daneshnameh.roshd.ir/mavara/mavara Index.Php?Page=%D8%Af%D9%86%D8%Af%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%Be%D8%B2%D8%B4%Da%A9%Db%8c&Ssoreturnpage=Check&Rand=0, Access date: 2015 Jun 1.
  3. Downs WB. Variations in Facial Relationships: Their Significance in Treatment and Prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948; 34(10): 812-840.
  4. Dewel BF. Clinical Observations on the Axial Inclination of Teeth. Am J Orthod 1949; 35(2): 98-115.
  5. Hosseini SMH, Chalipa J, Fatemi SM, Heidari F. Evaluation and Comparison of Mesiodistal Inclination of Posterior Teeth in Skeletodental class II and Class I. J Dental Medicine 2010; 23(2): 134-140.
  6. Atabaki M. Cephalometric evaluation of adults with normal occlusion. DDS Thesis, Mashhad School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, 19983 [In Persian].
  7. Ramezanzadeh B. Evaluation of skeletal jaw relationships in patients without malocclusion. DDS Thesis, Mashhad School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, 1993 [In Persian].
  8. Farahani M, Seifi M, Eslami Y. A Comparison of Cephalometric Standards of Iranian and American Caucasian Adolescents. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2004; 22 (3):495-501 [In Persian].
  9. Ramezanzadeh B, Sabzevari B. Cephalometric Evaluation of Craniofacial Features of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion in Patients 11-14 Years old Referred to Mashhad Dental School during 1996-2002. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2005; 23(1): 37-47 [In Persian].
  10. Yarshousaz M, Eslamian L, Basiri N, Amin Tavakkoli M. Radiographic Evaluation of Upper Airway Spaces in Patients with Skeletal Anteroposterior and Vertical Malocclusions. J Dent Sch Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2003; 21(2): 290-297.
  11. Graber L. Orthodontics current principles and techniques. 5th ed., United States of America, Duncan L, 2012; P 166.
  12. Amirian A. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of enlarged adenoid (hypertrophied) on skeletal, Dentofacial characteristics in children 11-3 Year. DDS Thesis, Qazvin Faculty of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, 1999 [In Persian].
  13. Lyberg T., Krogstad O., Djupesland G. Cephalometric Analysis in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome.I. Skeletal morphology. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 1989; 103 (2): 287-292.
  14. Kachoei M, Moghimi M, Azizi A. The Relationship between Primary Occlusion Characteristics and Mouth Breathing in Pre-School Children in Tabriz, Iran. Journal of Isfahan Dental School 2010; 6(2): 86-92 [In Persian].
  15. de Freitas MR, Alcazar NM, Janson G, de Freitas KM, Henriquesa JF. Upper and Lower Pharyngeal Airways in Subjects with Class I and Class II Malocclusions and Different Growth Patterns. AmJ OrthodDentofacial Orthop 2007; 130(6): 742-745.
  16. Nunes WR Jr, Di Francesco RC. Variation of Patterns of Malocclusion by Site of Pharyngeal Obstruction in Children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 136(11): 1116-20.
  17. Martin O., Muelas L., Vinas M. J. Nasopharyngeal Cephalometric Study of Ideal Occlusions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2006; 130(4): 436. E 1-436-E9.
  18. Shen GF, Samman N, Qiu W.L, Tang YS, Xia J, Huang Y.L. Cephalometric Studies on the Upper Airway Space in Normal Chinese. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 1994; 23(4): 243-247.
  19. Takemoto Y, Saitoh I, Iwasaki T, Inada E, Yamada C, Iwase Y, et al. Pharyngeal Airway in Children with Prognathism and Normal Occlusion. Angle Orthod 2011; 81(1): 75-80.
  20. El H, Palomo JM. Airway Volume for Different Dentofacial Skeletal Patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139(6): E511-21.