Comparing Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Different Preparation-Obturation Combinations

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Social Determinant of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran

Abstract

Background:One of the main reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth is vertical root fracture (VRF). Some factors such as root canal treatment are involved in vertical root fracture because of their potential to weaken the tooth structure. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of combining different obturation materials and rotary systems on the fracture resistance of treated teeth.
Methods:Eighty extracted maxillary central incisors were selected. The coronal portions of all teeth wereremoved at the cemento-enamel junction leaving the root segment of nearly 13 mm length. Roots were randomly divided into2 groups according to the system used in root canal preparations, Group I: ProTaper, Group II: Wave 1. Each main group was further subdivided into 2 equal subgroups according to the obturation system being used, Subgroup A: ProTaper, AH26 obturator, Subgroup B: ProTaper, Bioceramic, Subgroup C: Wave 1, AH26 obturator and Subgroup D: Wave 1, Bioceramic. Fracture resistance of each sample was measured by loading in universal testing machine. The results were analyzed with two-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparison Tukey HSD test.
Results: The highest mean fracture resistance value (256.7N) was associated with Soft-Core/AH26 obturation and wave one (subgroup C), while the lowest value (239.8 N) was for Bioceramic sealer and Wave 1 (subgroup D); however, there was no statistical significant difference (P>0.05) among all tested subgroups.
Conclusion: All instrumentation techniques caused weakening of the root structure and made them susceptible to fracture without any significant difference and therefore alternative strategies should be considered to reinforce endodontically treated roots.

Keywords


  1. Schafer E, Oitzinger M. Cutting efficiency of five different types of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 2008; 34(2):198-200.
  2. Pitts DL, Natkin E. Diagnosis and treatment of vertical root fractures. J Endod 1983; 9(8):338-46.
  3. Lertchirakarn V, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Load and strain during lateral condensation and vertical root fracture. J Endod 1999; 25(2):99-104.
  4. Haueisen H, Gartner K, Kaiser L, Trohorsch D, Heidemann D. Vertical root fracture: prevalence, etiology, and diagnosis. Quintessence Int 2013; 44(7):467-74.
  5. Cobankara FK, Ungor M, Belli S. The effect of two different root canal sealers and smear layer on resistance to root fracture. J Endod 2002; 28(8):606-9.
  6. Shemesh H, Bier CA, Wu MK, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR. The effects of canal preparation and filling on the incidence of dentinal defects. Int Endod J 2009; 42(3):208-13.
  7. Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation. J Endod 2009; 35(2):236-8.
  8. Yoldas O, Yilmaz S, Atakan G, Kuden C, Kasan Z. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. J Endod 2012; 38(2):232-5.
  9. Zandbiglari T, Davids H, Schafer E. Influence of instrument taper on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101(1):126-31.
  10. Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, Pini P, Balleri P, Grandini S. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. Int Endod J 2005; 38(9):610-6.
  11. Berutti E, Chiandussi G, Paolino DS, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Canal shaping with WaveOne Primary reciprocating files and ProTaper system: a comparative study. J Endod 2012; 38(4):505-9.
  12. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. Comparison of mandibular premolars and canines with respect to their resistance to vertical root fracture. J Dent 2004; 32(4):265-8.
  13. Schafer E, Zandbiglari T, Schafer J. Influence of resin-based adhesive root canal fillings on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots: an in vitro preliminary study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103(2):274-9.
  14. Fuss Z, Lustig J, Tamse A. Prevalence of vertical root fractures in extracted endodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 1999; 32(4):283-6.
  15. Seo DG, Yi YA, Shin SJ, Park JW. Analysis of factors associated with cracked teeth. J Endod 2012; 38(3):288-92.
  16. Ersoy I, Evcil MS. Evaluation of the effect of different root canal obturation techniques using two root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots. Microsc Res Tech 2015; 78(5):404-7.
  17. Selden HS. Repair of incomplete vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth--in vivo trials. J Endod 1996; 22(8):426-9.
  18. Tamse A, Zilburg I, Halpern J. Vertical root fractures in adjacent maxillary premolars: an endodontic-prosthetic perplexity. Int Endod J 1998; 31(2):127-32.
  19. Taschieri S, Tamse A, Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Tsesis I. A new surgical technique for preservation of endodontically treated teeth with coronally located vertical root fractures: a prospective case series. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110(6):e45-52.
  20. Zamin C, Silva-Sousa YT, Souza-Gabriel AE, Messias DF, Sousa-Neto MD. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Traumatol 2012; 28(4):282-6.
  21. Shaheen NA, Farag AM, Alhadainy HA, Darrag AM. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots using different preparation obturation combinations. Tanta Dent J. 2013;10:97–102.
  22. Nur BG, Ok E, Altunsoy M, Tanriver M, Capar ID. Fracture strength of roots instrumented with three different single file systems in curved root canals. Eur J Dent 2015; 9(2):189-93.
  23. Hammad M, Qualtrough A, Silikas N. Effect of new obturating materials on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2007; 33:732-6.
  24. Topcuoglu HS, Arslan H, Keles A, Koseoglu M. Fracture resistance of roots filled with three different obturation techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17:e528-32.
  25. Langalia AK, Dave B, Patel N, Thakkar V, Sheth S, Parekh V. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated with resin based adhesive sealers with conventional obturation technique: an in vitro study. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7:6-12.
  26. Celikten B, Uzuntas CF, Gulsahi K. Resistance to fracture of dental roots obturated with different materials. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015:591031.