In Vitro Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Zirconia Restorations Veneered by Two Different Systems: Rapid Layer Technique and Zir/CAD/CAM

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 MSc, Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

2 MSc, Associate Professor, Implant Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran

3 MSc, Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran

4 PHD, Assistant Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran

5 MSc, Assistant Professor, Implant Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the fracture resistance of zirconia restorations fabricated with rapid layer (RL group) technique and zirconia computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (zir/CAD/CAM) system (ZC group).
Methods:This study evaluated 30 all-ceramic crowns in two groups of 15. After fabricating the metal dies and scanning them by the CAD/CAM scanner, the crowns in RL group were anatomically designed and divided into two parts of the core and the veneering. Each part was milled separately by the machine. The core and the veneering were fabricated and cemented. An index was obtained from the restorations and used for the fabrication of samples in the ZC group. In the latter group, the metal dies were scanned and zirconia cores were milled by the machine. The veneering porcelain powder was then applied. Samples in both groups were cemented over metal dies using a glass ionomer cement. The fracture resistance of the complex was measured by a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16.
Results:The mean fracture resistance of RL and ZC groups was not significantly different (P>0.05). The mode of failure was adhesive in all samples in RL group and cohesive in 85% of samples in ZC group. The remaining samples in ZC group showed a total fracture in the core and the veneering.
Conclusion: The fracture resistance of restorations fabricated by the zir/CAD/CAM and RL systems is not significantly different.

Keywords


  1. Ereifej N, Rodrigues FP, Silikas N, Watts DC. Experimental and FE shear-bonding strength at core/veneer interfaces in bilayered ceramics. Dent Mater 2011; 27(6):590-7.
  2. Martinez-Rus F, Suarez MJ, Rivera B, Pradies G. Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105(2):108-14.
  3. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. China: Mosby 2006.
  4. Baldassarri M, Stappert CF, Wolff MS, Thompson VP, Zhang Y. Residual stresses in porcelain-veneered zirconia prostheses. Dent Mater 2012; 28(8):873-9.
  5. Chantranikul N, Salimee P. Biaxial flexural strength of bilayered zirconia using various veneering ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2015; 7(5):358-67.
  6. Nishihara H, Haro Adanez M, Att W. Current status of zirconia implants in dentistry: preclinical tests. J Prosthodont Res 2018; 63(1): 1-14.
  7. Saito A, Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. A comparison of bond strength of layered veneering porcelains to zirconia and metal. J Prosthet Dent 2010; 104(4):247-57.
  8. Yilmaz H, Nemli SK, Aydin C, Bal BT, Tiras T. Effect of fatigue on biaxial flexural strength of bilayered porcelain/zirconia (Y-TZP) dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2011; 27(8):786-95.
  9. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008; 17(1):9-13.
  10. Toksavul S, Turkun M, Toman M. Esthetic enhancement of ceramic crowns with zirconia dowels and cores: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92(2):116-9.
  11. Fahmy NZ. Bond strength, microhardness, and core/veneer interface quality of an all-ceramic system. J Prosthodont 2010; 19(2):95-102.
  12. Choi YS, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS. In vitro evaluation of fracture strength of zirconia restoration veneered with various ceramic materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2012; 4(3):162-9.
  13. Benic GI, Sailer I, Zeltner M, Gutermann JN, Ozcan M, Muhlemann S. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 121(3):426-31.
  14. Da Cunha Fontoura D, de Magalhaes Barros V, de Magalhaes CS, Vaz RR, Moreira AN. Evaluation of vertical misfit of CAD/CAM implant-supported titanium and zirconia frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018; 33(5):1027-32.
  15. Habib SR. Digital microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancies of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia cores. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2019; 64(2):207-14.
  16. Moilanen P, Hjerppe J, Lassila LV, Narhi TO. Fracture strength and precision of fit of implant-retained monolithic zirconia crowns. J Oral Implantol 2018; 44(5):330-4.
  17. Nikzadjamnani S, Zarrati S, Rostamzadeh M. Microtensile bond strength between zirconia core and veneering porcelain after different surface treatments. J Dent (Tehran) 2017; 14(6):303-12.
  18. Abrisham SM, Fallah Tafti A, Kheirkhah S, Tavakkoli MA. Shear bond strength of porcelain to a base-metal compared to zirconia core. J Dent Biomater 2017; 4(1):367-72.
  19. Zaher AM, Hochstedler JL, Rueggeberg FA, Kee EL. Shear bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics veneered with 2 different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2017; 118(2):221-7.
  20. Nishigori A, Yoshida T, Bottino MC, Platt JA. Influence of zirconia surface treatment on veneering porcelain shear bond strength after cyclic loading. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112(6):1392-8.
  21. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009; 25(1):121-8.
  22. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98(5):389-404.
  23. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91(4):356-62.
  24. Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95(6):430-6.
  25. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A. Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int 2007; 38(9):745-53.
  26. Kanat B, Comlekoglu EM, Dundar-Comlekoglu M, Hakan Sen B, Ozcan M, Ali Gungor M. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs J Prosthodont 2014; 23(6):445-55.
  27. Choi BK, Han JS, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH. Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia and metal cores. J Adv Prosthodont 2009; 1(3):129-35.
  28. Chen C, Trindade FZ, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM Resin Nano Ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater 2014; 30(9):954-62.