CBCT Findings in Different Types of Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

3 Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences Dental School, Guilan, Iran

5 Post Graduate Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

Background: Ankylosis of temporomandibular joint describes the pathological development of bony connections or fibrosis that occurs in the region between the condylar head of the mandible and the glenoid fossa of the temporal bone. This condition can severely affect the function of temporomandibular joint and its mobility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the practicality of CBCT imaging in different types of temporomandibular joint ankylosis.
Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 32 cases of ankylosed temporomandibular joint from 26 patients (12 males and 14 females) aged 8-65 years (mean age: 29.8±14.3) who had visited a private maxillofacial clinic between 2013 and 2016 for CBCT images of temporomandibular joint and had been diagnosed with ankylosis by a maxillofacial surgeon. The present study relied on both Dongmei’s and Sawhney’s classifications to assess the different types of joint ankylosis. A number of morphological parameters, including: D1 (the mediolateral diameter of the condyle), D2 (the width of the bony fusion area), D3 (the degree of calcification in the bony fusion area) and D4 (the D2/D1 ratio) were also defined and registered.
Results: All of the four variables (D1, D2, D2/D1 and D4) showed a negative correlation with the extent of mouth opening, but the amounts were non-significant (P>0.05). The level of agreement between the two classification approaches was significantly low (P=0.003). The highest degree of coronoid hyperplasia was seen in types II and III according to both Sawhney’s and Dongmei’s classifications. The greatest measure of condylar head displacement was observed in types II and III of Sawhney’s, and type III of Dongmei’s classification. Connection in the lateral side of the joint in type III of both Sawhney’s and Dongmei’s classifications was the most frequent case. More severe cases of ankylosis were commonly associated with older ages, but the relationship was not significant (P>0.05).
Conclusions:CBCT seems to be the most advantageous modality of imaging as far as temporomandibular joint abnormalities are concerned, including ankylosis. Although the application of the two conventional classifications (Sawhney’s and Dongmei’s) produced little agreement in terms of radiological findings, it seems that the employment of such classifications in conjunction with CBCT imaging is a promising method for the diagnosis and evaluation of temporomandibular joint ankylosis.

Keywords


  1. Alomar X, Medrano J, Cabratosa J, Clavero JA, Lorente M, Serra I, et al. Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2007; 28(3):170-83.
  2. Deng TG, Liu CK, Liu P, Zhang LL, Wu LG, Zhou HZ, et al. Influence of the lateralpterygoid muscle on traumatic temporomandibular joint bony ankylosis. BMC Oral Health 2016; 16(1):62.
  3. Bello SA, Aluko Olokun B, Olaitan AA, Ajike SO. Aetiology and presentation of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: report of 23 cases from Abuja, Nigeria. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50(1):80-4.
  4. Arakeri G, Kusanale A, Zaki GA, Brennan PA. Pathogenesis of post-traumatic ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a critical review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50(1):8-12.
  5. Kumar LK, Manuel S, Kurien NM, Khalam SA, Menon VP. An interesting radiological picture of post traumatic TMJ ankylosis due to sagittal condylar fracture. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 12:11-4.
  6. Ko EW, Huang CS, Chen YR, Figueroa AA. Cephalometric craniofacial characteristics in patients with temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Chang Gung Med J 2005; 28(7):456-66.
  7. Ahmad M, Hollender L, Anderson Q, Kartha K, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL, et al. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107(6):844-60.
  8. Crow H, Parks E, Campbell JH, Stucki DS, Daggy J. The utility of panoramic radiography in temporomandibular joint assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 34(2):91-5.
  9. Aggrawal S, Mulkhopadhyay S, Berry M, Bhargava S, Bony ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: a computed tomography study. Oral surgery, oral meducune, oral pathology 1990;69(1):128-32
  10. Yan Y, Zhang Y, Sun Z, Li J, Xiao E, An J. The relationship between mouth opening and computerized tomographic features of posttraumatic bony ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111(3):354-61.
  11. Roh HS, Kim W, Kim YK, Lee JY. Relationships between disk displacement, joint effusion, and degenerative changes ofthe TMJ in TMD patients based on MRI findings. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012; 40(3):283-6.
  12. Alkhader M, Kuribayashi A, Ohbayashi N, Nakamura S, Kurabayashi T. Usefulness of cone beam computed tomography in temporomandibular joints with soft tissue pathology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39(6):343-8.
  13. He D, Yang C, Chen M, Zhang X, Qiu Y, Yang X, et al. Traumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis: our classification and treatment experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69(6):1600-7.
  14. Anyanechi CE. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis caused by condylar fractures: a retrospective analysis of cases at an urban teaching hospital in Nigeria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44(8):1027-33.
  15. Shintaku WH, Venturin JS, Azevedo B, Noujeim M. Applications of cone‐beam computed tomography in fractures of the maxillofacial complex. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25(4):358-66.
  16. Katsnelson A, Markiewicz MR, Keith DA, Dodson TB. Operative management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70(3):531-6.
  17. Hintze H, Wiese M, Wenzel A. Cone beam CT and conventional tomography for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007; 36(4):192-7.
  18. Honda K, Larheim TA, Maruhashi K, Matsumoto K, Iwai K. Osseous abnormalities of themandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35(3):152-7.
  19. Honey OB, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ, Klueber K, Silveira AM, Haskell BS, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132(4):429-38.
  20. Tsiklakis K. Cone beam computed tomographic findings in temporomandibular joint disorders. Alpha Omegan 2010; 103(2):68-78.
  21. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106(1):106-14.
  22. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33(2):83-6.
  23. Sawhney CP. Bony ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint: follow-up of 70 patients treated with arthroplasty and acrylic spacer interposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77(1):29-40.
  24. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Health Sciences Division; 2014.
  25. Andersson J, Hallmer F, Eriksson L. Unilateral mandibular condylar fractures: a 31-year follow-up of non-surgical treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36(4):310-4.
  26. Remi M, Christine MC, Gael P, Soizick P, Joseph-Andre J. Mandibular fractures in children: long term results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67(1):25-30.
  27. Rutges JP, Kruizinga EH, Rosenberg A, Koole R. Functional results after conservative treatment of fractures of the mandibularcondyle. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45(1):30-4.
  28. Malik NA. Textbook of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Pub; 2012.
  29. Dahlstorm L, Kahnberg KE, Lindahl L. 15years follow-up on condylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;18(1):18-23.
  30. Nam SM, Kim YB, Lee SJ, Park ES, Lee JH. A comparative study of intraoral versus retromandibular approach in the management of subcondylar fracture. BMC Surgery 2019; 19(1):28.
  31. Vasconcelos BC, Bessa-Nogueira RV, Cypriano RV. Treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis by gap arthroplasty. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11(1):66-9.
  32. El-Hakim IE, Metwalli SA. Imaging of temporomandibular joint ankylosis. A new radiographic classification. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31(1):19-23.
  33. Ferretti C, Bryant R, Becker P, Lawrence C. Temporomandibular joint morphology following post-traumatic ankylosis in 26 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34(4):376-81.
  34. Long X, Goss AN. Pathological changes after the surgical creation of a vertical intracapsular condylar fracture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36(9):834-7.
  35. Meng FW, Zhao JL, Hu KJ, Liu YP. A new hypothesis of mechanisms of traumatic ankylosis of temporomandibular joint. Med Hypotheses 2009; 73(1):92-3.
  36. Rowe NL. Ankulosis of the temporomandibular joint. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh. 1982;27(2);67-79.
  37. Duan D, Zhang Y . A clinical investigation on disc displacement in sagittal fracture of the mandibular condyle and its association with TMJ ankylosis development. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2011; 40(2):134-8.
  38. Long X, Goss AN. A sheep model of intracapsular condylar fracture. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2007; 65(6):1102-8.
  39. Dongmei He, Ellis 3rd E, Zhang Y. Etiology of temporomandibular joint ankylosis secondary to condylar fractures: the role of concomitant mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66(1):77-84.
  40.  Xiang GL, Long X, Deng MH, Han QC, Meng QG, Li B. A retrospective study of temporomandibular joint ankylosis secondary to surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 52(3):270-4ahlstorm L, Kahnberg KE, Lindahl L. 15years follow-up on condylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;18(1):18-23.
  41. Zhang Y, He DM, Ma XC. [Posttraumatic temporomandibular joint ankylosis: clinical development and surgical management]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2006; 41(12):751-4. [In Chinese].
  42. Pirok Dj, Merrik RG. Dislocation of the mandibular condyle into the middle cranial fossa. Report of a case. Oral surgery, oral medicine and oral pathology. 1970;29(1):13-8.
  43. Qiu YT, Yang C, Wang YI, chen MJ, Zhang SY. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint ankylosis resulting from intracapsular conyle fracture. China Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 2006;2:003.
  44. Arya V, Chigurupati R. Treatment algorithm for intracranial intrusion injuries of the mandibular condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 74(3):569-81.
  45. Liu CK, Liu P, Meng FW, Deng BL, Xue Y, Mao TQ, et al. The role of the lateral pterygoid muscle in the sagittal fracture of mandibular condyle (SFMC) healing process. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 50(4):356-60.
  46. Tavassol F, Spalthoff S, Essig H, Bredt M, Gellrich NC, Kokemuller H. Elongated coronoid process: CT-based quantitative analysis of the coronoid process and review of literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41(3):331-8.
  47. Wang WH, Xu B, Zhang BJ, Lou HQ. Temporomandibular joint ankylosis contributing to coronoid process hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45(10):1229-33.
  48. Kumar P, Singh V, Agrawal A, Bhagol A, Bali R. Incremental increase in percentage mouth opening after coronoidectomy in temporomandibular joint ankylosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44(7):859-63.
  49. Xia L, An J, He Y, Xiao E, Chen S, Yan Y, et al. Association between the clinical features of and types of temporomandibular joint ankylosis based on a modified classification system. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1):10493.