Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- Saharnaz Esmaeili 1
- Nazanin Malek Mohammadi 1
- Sarvin Khosravani 1
- Ladan Eslamian 2
- Saeed Reza Motamedian 3
1 Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Orthodontics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Orthodontics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranSciences, Tehran, Iran & Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate age- and gender-specific soft and hard tissue cephalometric features in an Iranian population with normal class I occlusion.
Methods: A total of 111 Iranians (56 females and 55 males) in two age groups including individuals aged between 12-16 years and individuals aged over 16 years, with well-balanced faces and class I occlusion, were selected. Overall, 81 (40 soft tissue and 41 hard tissue) cephalometric measurements of the selected samples were traced on all cephalograms. The obtained values were compared in terms of gender and age differences and also ethnic differences between Iranian and European races.
Results: This study indicated significant differences between Iranian men and women of different ages and Caucasians in terms of hard and soft tissue cephalometric measurements, which should be considered in orthodontic and surgical treatments. Some of the most important differences are greater values of facial convexity angle, nasolabial angle, and soft tissue chin thickness in Iranians than in Caucasians.
Conclusion: In general, slightly more convex profiles, more protruded lips, less prominent noses, higher nose tips, and proclined and protruded central incisors are acceptable in the Iranian population. Also, Iranian women have more convex soft and hard tissue profiles, shorter anterior and posterior facial heights, larger interlabial gaps, less deep superior sulci, thinner and shorter upper lips, and thinner soft tissue chins than men. Also, non-growing adults have more advanced mandibles, larger noses, more sloping nasal tips, and larger skeletal dimensions compared with growing ones.
Keywords
S, et al. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis for Pakistani adult
using Holdaway’s analysis. Int Med J. 2018;25(1):51-3.
2. Imani MM, Hosseini SA, Arab S, Delavarian M.
Characterization of soft tissue cephalometric norms of Kurdish
population of Iran. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2018;6(1):335-42.
doi: 10.5455/jrmds.20186155.
3. Sarver DM. Interactions of hard tissues, soft tissues, and
growth over time, and their impact on orthodontic diagnosis
and treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2015;148(3):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.030.
4. Kumari L, Das A. Determination of Tweed’s cephalometric
norms in Bengali population. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(3):305-10.
doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_274_16.
5. Anić-Milošević S, Anić-Milošević S, Lapter-Varga M,
Dumancic J, Šlaj M. Analysis of the soft tissue profile in
Croatians with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces.
Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(3):305-10. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq072.
6. Amini F, Razavian ZS, Rakhshan V. Soft tissue cephalometric
norms of Iranian class I adults with good occlusions and
balanced faces. Int Orthod. 2016;14(1):108-22. doi:
10.1016/j.ortho.2015.12.003. [English, French].
7. Mafi AA, Shahverdiani R, Mafi P. Ideal soft tissue facial profile
in Iranian males and females: clinical implications. World J
Plast Surg. 2018;7(2):179-85.
8. Shamlan MA, Aldrees AM. Hard and soft tissue correlations
in facial profiles: a canonical correlation study. Clin Cosmet
Investig Dent. 2015;7:9-15. doi: 10.2147/ccide.s73457.
9. Storniolo-Souza JM, Seminario MP, Pinzan-Vercelino
CRM, Pinzan A, Janson G. McNamara analysis
cephalometric parameters in White-Brazilians, Japanese
and Japanese-Brazilians with normal occlusion. Dental
Press J Orthod. 2021;26(1):e2119133. doi: 10.1590/2177-
6709.26.1.e2119133.oar.
10. Uysal T, Baysal A, Yagci A, Sigler LM, McNamara JA Jr.
Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and
European-American young adults with normal occlusions and
well-balanced faces. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(3):296-301. doi:
10.1093/ejo/cjq165.
11. Singh R, Awasthy A, Krishna BP, Mazhar H, Soni SK, Thomas
AE. Do we vary from Caucasians! Cephalometric analysis for
orthognathic surgery in Chhattisgarhi population. J Maxillofac
Oral Surg. 2021. doi: 10.1007/s12663-021-01559-4.
12. Cooke MS, Wei SH. A comparative study of southern
Chinese and British Caucasian cephalometric standards.
Angle Orthod. 1989;59(2):131-8. doi: 10.1043/0003-
3219(1989)059 < 0131:acsosc > 2.0.co;2.
13. Todorova-Plachiyska KG, Stoilova-Todorova MG. Lateral
cephalometric study in adult Bulgarians with normal
occlusion. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2018;60(1):141-6. doi:
10.1515/folmed-2017-0072.
14. Huang WJ, Taylor RW, Dasanayake AP. Determining
cephalometric norms for Caucasians and African Americans
in Birmingham. Angle Orthod. 1998;68(6):503-11. doi:
10.1043/0003-3219(1998)068 < 0503:dcnfca > 2.3.co;2.
15. Azarbayejani S, Omrani A, Kalaantar-Motamedi A, Abdellahi
M, Taalebi V, Teimoori F. Cephalometric norms for 6-17
year-old Iranians with normal occlusion and well-balanced
faces. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014;11(3):327-35.
16. Karaca Bozdağ Z, Kurkcuoglu A, Guney AU, Cam Y, Oguz O.
An assessment of gender difference in visual cephalometric
analysis applied to class I individuals: a preliminary study.
East J Med. 2019;24(1):1-7. doi: 10.5505/ejm.2019.40570.
17. Ghorbanyjavadpour F, Rakhshan V. Factors associated with the
beauty of soft-tissue profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2019;155(6):832-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.07.020.
18. Ahangar Atashi MH, Kachooei M. Soft tissue cephalometric
standards based on NHP in a sample of Iranian adults. J Dent
Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2008;2(2):53-7. doi: 10.5681/
joddd.2008.011.
19. Rakhshan V, Ghorbanyjavadpour F. Anteroposterior
and vertical soft tissue cephalometric norms of Iranians,
interethnic comparisons, sex dimorphism, and the effect
of age on cephalometric variables. Oral Maxillofac Surg.
2019;23(2):167-78. doi: 10.1007/s10006-019-00755-4.
20. Khosravanifard B, Raeisi E, Kadkhodaei Oliadarani F,
Rakhshan V. Soft-tissue anthropometric norms of Iranians
with proper occlusion and inter-ethnic norm comparisons.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018;17(4):588-96. doi: 10.1007/
s12663-018-1101-8.
21. Khosravani S, Esmaeili S, Malek Mohammadi N, Eslamian
L, Dalaie K, Motamedian SR. Inter and intra-rater reliability
of lateral cephalometric analysis using 2D dolphin imaging
software. J Dent Sch. 2020;38(4):148-52. doi: 10.22037/jds.
v38i4.35384.
22. Hajighadimi M, Dougherty HL, Garakani F. Cephalometric
evaluation of Iranian children and its comparison with Tweed’s
and Steiner’s standards. Am J Orthod. 1981;79(2):192-7. doi:
10.1016/0002-9416(81)90317-1.
23. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its
use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod.
1983;84(1):1-28. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90144-6.
24. Khosravanifard B, Rakhshan V, Raeesi E. Factors influencing
attractiveness of soft tissue profile. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.
oooo.2012.03.021.
25. Al-Jame B, Artun J, Al-Azemi R, Behbehani F, Buhamra S.
Lateral cephalometric norms for adolescent Kuwaitis: hard
tissue measurements. Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(2):91-7. doi:
10.1159/000090910.
)