Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Oral and Dental Diseases Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
2 Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
3 Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
4 Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
Abstract
Background: Amalgam is a safe and effective option for direct restorations. For amalgam repairs, it is recommended to use composite resin along with an adhesive agent on pretreated amalgam surfaces. This study investigated the shear bond strength (SBS) between composite and both new and aged amalgam, using different universal adhesives on the pretreated alloy surfaces.
Methods: In this experimental in-vitro study, a total of 132 amalgam discs were prepared and divided into two main groups: fresh and aged (6 months water storage + 2000 thermal cycles). The aged amalgam specimens were randomly treated with sandblasting, pumice, or bur. Based on the type of adhesive used, each treated group was further divided into three subgroups: Single Bond Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, and G-Premio Bond. Fresh amalgam groups were randomly divided into the Single Bond Universal and Clearfil Universal Bond subgroups. All samples were repaired with composite and then subjected to 2000 thermal cycles, followed by SBS assessment using a universal testing machine. One-way and two-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey’s, Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and T-tests were used for statistical analysis.
Results: Single Bond Universal + pumice exhibited the highest SBS and Clearfil Universal Bond + bur was associated with the lowest SBS. Among the aged samples, groups prepared with bur had significantly lower SBS values compared to those treated with sandblasting or pumice. The SBS values for the Single Bond Universal groups were significantly greater than those for the Clearfil Universal Bond groups.
Conclusion: Pretreatment with pumice and sandblasting yielded the highest SBS between aged amalgam and composite. Furthermore, Single Bond Universal resulted in the best SBS values.
Keywords
Main Subjects
1.Shen C, Speigel J, Mjör IA. Repair strength of dental amalgams. Oper Dent. 2006;31(1):122-6. doi: 10.2341/04-205.
2.Özcan M, Vallittu P, Huysmans M-C, Kalk W, Vahlberg T. Bond strength of resin composite to differently conditioned amalgam. J Mater Sci Mater in Med. 2006; 17(1):7-13. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-6324-4.
3.Balkaya H, Demirbuga S, Çakir NN, Karadas M, Zorba YO. Micro-shear bond strength of universal adhesives used for amalgam repair with or without Alloy Primer. J Conserve Dent. 2018;21(3):274-9. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_290_17.
4.Moncada G, Fernández E, Martín J, Arancibia C, Mjör I, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2008;33(3):258-64. doi: 10.2341/07-113.
5.Mjör I, Reep R, Kubilis P, Mondragon B. Change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: a methodological study. Oper Dent. 1998;23(5):272-7. doi:10.1590/S1980-65232010000200009
- Rooholahi MR, Rezvani MB, Niknami M, Moradi Z, Peyro Musavi F. Effect of different conditioning methods on the surface roughness of dental amalgam: SEM analysis. Euro J Nat Soc Sci. 2014;3(3):285-92.
7. Sanal FA, Guler D. Evaluation of effectiveness of Self-adhesive composites for amalgam repair with or without alloy primer, in terms of shear bond strength. Odovtos Int J Dent Sci. 2020;22(3):135-44. doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2020.40593
- Machado C, Sanchez E, Alapati S, Seghi R, Johnston W. Shear bond strength of the amalgam-resin composite interface. Oper Dent. 2007;32(4):341-6. doi: 10.2341/06-100.
9.Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(1):15-26.
10.Fruits TJ, Duncanson Jr MG, Coury TL. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam. Quintessence int. 1998;29(5):327-34.
- Mirzania N, Zajkani E, Naghili A. Evaluation of micro -shear bond strength of composite to amalgam using different bonding systems. Caspian J Dent Res. 2022; 11(2):115 -23.
doi: 10.22088/cjdr.11.2.115
12.Kanzow P, Baxter S, Rizk M, Wassmann T, Wiegand A. Effectiveness of a universal adhesive for repair bonding to composite and amalgam. J Oral Sci. 2019;61(2):343-50. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.18-0301.
13.Blum IR, Hafiana K, Curtis A, Barbour ME, Attin T, Lynch CD, et al. The effect of surface conditioning on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam. J Dent. 2012;40(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.019.
14.Diefenderfer KE, Reinhardt J. Shear bond strengths of 10 adhesive resin/amalgam combinations. Oper Dent. 1997;22(2):50-6.
15.Khoroushi M, Yeganehjo M. Shear bond strength of Composite/Amalgam restorations: Effect of using adhesive cement. J Iran Dent Assoc. 2007;19(2):56-61.
16.Tolidis K, Boutsiouki C, Gerasimou P. Microleakage in combined amalgam/composite resin restorations in MOD cavities. Braz J Oral Sci. 2013;12(2):190-4. doi:10.1590/S1677-32252013000200006
17.Bulucu B, Yeşilyurt C, Bayram M. Evaluation of adhesive systems bond strength on amalgam repair. Balk J Stom. 2006; 10:1-5. doi: 10.1007/s11223-020-00234-2
18.Ahmed MH, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Yoshihara K, Van Meerbeek B. Do universal adhesives benefit from an extra bonding layer? J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(2):117-32. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a42304.
- Erçin Ö, Alkan FE, Arhun N. Shear bond strength of different adhesive systems in amalgam repair. Strength Mater. 2020;52(5):805-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-020-00234-2
20.Hellak A, Ebeling J, Schauseil M, Stein S, Roggendorf M, Korbmacher-Steiner H. Shear bond strength of three orthodontic bonding systems on enamel and restorative materials. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/6307107.
21.Flury S, Dulla FA, Peutzfeldt A. Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short-and long-term storage. Dent Mater. 2019;35(9):1205-13. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.05.008.
22.Jayasheel A, Niranjan N, Pamidi H, Suryakanth MB. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of universal dental adhesives-an in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(7):e892-6. doi: 10.4317/jced.53816.
23.Chen C, Niu L-N, Xie H, Zhang Z-Y, Zhou L-Q, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine–old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004.
24.Zecin-Deren A, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Piwonski I, Sokolowski J, Lapinska B. The influence of application protocol of simplified and universal adhesives on the dentin bonding performance. Appl Sci. 2019;10(1):124-30. doi: 10.3390/app10010124
25.Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, et al. Comparison between universal adhesives and two‐step self‐etch adhesives in terms of dentin bond fatigue durability in self‐etch mode. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017;125(3):215-22. doi: 10.1111/eos.12346.
26.Papadogiannis D, Dimitriadi M, Zafiropoulou M, Gaintantzopoulou M-D, Eliades G. Universal adhesives: setting characteristics and reactivity with dentin. J Mater. 2019;12(10):1720. doi: 10.3390/ma12101720.
27.Merwade S. The role of oxygen inhibited layer on the shear bond strength of composites-An in-vitro evaluation. J Cons Dent 2007;10(1):1-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.42273.
- Choo SS, Huh YH, Cho LR, Park CJ. Effect of metal primers and tarnish treatment on bonding between dental alloys and veneer resin. J Adv Prosthodont.2015;7(5):392–9. doi:10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.392
29.Kavian M, Mirzakochaki Borujeni P, Hekmat A, Salehi M. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite to amalgam with the use of different bonding agents. J Isfahan Dent Sch. 2018;13(4):443-50. doi: 10.48305/v13i4.1178
30.Hadavi F, Hey J, Czech D, Ambrose E. Tensile bond strength of repaired amalgam. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67(3):313-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90236-4.
31.Naseh R, Rahnamoon N, Afshari M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments to amalgam surfaces using assure universal bonding resin after different surface treatments. Iran J Ortho. 2016;11(2): e5804. doi:10.17795/ijo-5804
32.Staxrud F, Mulic A. Bonding of composite and Glass-Inomer to amalgam. J Dent Oral Biol. 2018;3(6):1145.
)