p. 457−469
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 470−483
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 484−490
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 491−498
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 499−509
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 510−523
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 524−532
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 533−541
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 542−554
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
0.05) affecting leisure time physical activities in wheelchairuser disabled. There was significant difference between the means of individual, structural and cultural-social barriers (F= 38.216, P < 0.05). The mean of cultural-social barriers (3.40 ± 0.91) was significantly more than individual (2.96 ± 0.79) and structural (3.06 ± 0.89) barriers. There was no significant difference between personal and structural barriers (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Wheelchair-based people consider more of the constraints to be related to the society, coworkers’ and familiars’ attitudes. Supportive approaches on disabled people would be pervasive in all aspect not limited just in physical and ergonomic structural ones. Physical activity is and inevitable need of life and is more important for disabled people, due their special condition.]]>
p. 555−568
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6
p. 569−591
2008-2843
Vol.22/No.6