Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences

Brain-Behavioral Systems in Patients with Comorbid Anxiety -Depression vs. Healthy Individuals

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Saeedeh Azaraeen 1
Roshanak Khodabakhsh 2
Zohreh Khosravi 3

1 PhD Student of Psychology, Department of Psychology, AL Zahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, AL Zahra University, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, AL Zahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Background: According to the brain-behavioral systems theory, behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems contribute to the development of many psychopathological conditions. Given that anxiety and depression are the most common emotional disorders and the fact that they are highly overlapping, the aim of this study was to compare the brain-behavioral systems in the patients with comorbid anxiety-depression and healthy individuals.
Method: This study was cross-sectional. Sample includes Sixty-four patients with comorbid anxiety and depression attending to the community health centers of Jiroft city and 64 healthy individuals. They were selected using purposive sampling and matched for age and gender. After obtaining informed consent, they were asked to fill Jackson-5 scale, Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Data are analyzed by MANOVA.
Results:The resuls showed that the two groups had significant differences in behavior inhibition system, fight, flight and freeze. However, there was no difference in behavioral activation system.
Conclusion: Given the observed differences in the brain-behavioral systems between patients with comorbid anxiety-depression and healthy individuals, this theory may explain the comorbidity of anxiety and depression.

Keywords

Brain
Behavioral Systems Anxiety Depression Comorbidity
  1. Essau CA. Comorbidity of depressive disorders among adolescents in community and clinical settings. Psychiatry Research 2008; 158(1):35-42.
  2. Essau CA, editor. Epidemiology, comorbidity, and course of adolescent depression. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  3. Garber J, Weersing VR. Comorbidity of anxiety and depression in youth: implications for treatment and prevention. Clin Psychol (New York) 2010; 17(4):293-306.
  4. Fichter MM, Quadflieg N, Fischer UC, Kohlboeck G. Twenty-five-year course and outcome in anxiety and depression in the upper Bavarian longitudinal community study. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2010; 122(1):75-85.
  5. Watson D, Tellegen A. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin 1985; 98(2):219-35.
  6. Clark LA, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol 1991; 100(3):316-36.
  7. Mineka S, Watson DW, Clark LA. Comorbidity of anxiety and unipolar mood disorders. Annu Rev Psychol 1998; 49:377-412.
  8. Krueger RF, Chentsova-Dutton YE, Markon KE, Goldberg D, Ormel J. A cross-cultural study of the structure of comorbidity among common psycho-pathological syndromes in the general health care setting. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 2003; 112(3):437-77.
  9. Krueger RF, Markon KE. Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2006; 2:111-33.
  10. Gray JA. Framework for A Taxonomy of Psychiatric Disorder. In: Van Goozen SH, Van de Poll NE, editors. Emotions: Essays on Emotion Theory. New York: Psychology Press; 1994.
  11. Gray JA, McNaughton N. The neuropsychology of anxiety: Reprise. In: Hope DA. (editor). Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Perspectives on anxiety, panic, and fear. Lincoln: Nebraska University; 1996: 61-134.
  12. Corr PJ. Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2004; 28(3):317-32.
  13. Bijttebier P, Beck I, Claes L, Vandereycken W. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations. Clin Psychol Rev 2009; 29(5):421-30.
  14. Corr PJ, editor. The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality. Swansea: University of Wales; 2008.
  15. Colder CR, O’Connor RM. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity model and child psychopathology: laboratory and questionnaire assessment of the BAS and BIS. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2004; 32(4):435-51.
  16. Alloy B, Bender RE, Wanger CA, Whitehouse WG, Abramson LY, Hogan ME, et al. Bipolar spectrum-substance use co-occurrence: behavioral approach system sensitivity and impulsivity as shared personality vulnerability. J Pers Soc Psychol 2009; 97(3):549-65.
  17. Quilty LC, Mackew L, Bagby RM. Distinct profiles of behavioral inhibition and activation system sensitivity in unipolar vs. bipolar mood disorders. Psychiatry Res 2014; 219(1):228-31.
  18. Gomez R, Corr PJ. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms: associations with gray’s and Tellegen’s models of personality. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010; 49(8):902-6.
  19. Heym N, Kantini E, Checkley HL, Cassaday HJ. Gray’s revised reinforcement sensitivity theory in relation to attention-deficit/hyperactivity and tourette-like behaviors in the general population. Pers Individ Dif 2015; 78:24-8.
  20. Pawluk EJ, Koerner N. A preliminary investigation of impulsivity in generalized anxiety disorder. Pers Individ Dif 2013; 54(6):732-7.
  21. Pinto-Meza A, Caseras X, Soler J, Puigdemont D, Pèrez V, Torrubia R. Behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems in current and recovered major depression participants. Pers Individ Dif 2006; 40(2):215-26.
  22. Kasch KL, Rottenberg J, Arnow BA, Gotlib IH. Behavioral activation and inhibition systems and the severity and course of depression. J Abnorm Psychol 2002; 111(4):589-97.
  23. Hundt NE, Nelson-Gray RO, Kimbrel NA, Mitchell JT, Kwapil TR. The interaction of reinforcement sensitivity and life events in the prediction of anhedonic depression and anxiety symptoms. Pers Individ Dif 2007; 43(5):1001-12.
  24. Johnson SL, Turner RJ, Iwata N. BIS/BAS levels and psychiatric disorder: an epidemiology study. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 2003; 25(1):25-36.
  25. Ly C, Gomez R. Unique associations of reinforcement sensitivity theory dimensions with social interaction anxiety and social observation anxiety. Pers Individ Dif 2014; 60:20-4.
  26. Vervoort L, Wolters LH, Hogendoorn SM, de Haan E, Boer F, Prins PJM. Sensitivity of gray’s behavioral inhibition system in clinically anxious and non-anxious children and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences 2010; 48(5):629-33.
  27. Kimbrel NA, Nelson-Gray RO, Mitchell JT. Reinforcement sensitivity and maternal style as predictors of psychopathology. Pers Individ Dif 2007; 42(6):1139-49.
  28. Muris P, Meesters C, de Kanter E, Timmerman PE. Behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation system scales for children: Relationships with Eysenck’s personality traits and psychopathological symptoms. Pers Individ Dif 2005; 38(4):831-41.
  29. Zinbarg RE, Yoon KL. RST and Clinical Disorders: Anxiety and Depression. In: Corr, PJ, editor. The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
  30. Schofield CA, Coles ME, Gibb BE. Retrospective reports of behavioral inhibition and young adults’ current symptoms of social anxiety, depression, and anxious arousal. J Anxiety Disord 2009; 23(7):884-90.
  31. Brown TA. Temporal course and structural relationships among dimensions of temperament and DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorder constructs. J Abnorm Psychol 2007; 116(2):313-28.
  32. Lahey BB. Public health significance of neuroticism. Am Psychol 2009; 64(4):241-56.
  33. Kovacs M, Lopez-Duran N. Prodromal symptoms and atypical affectivity as predictors of major depression in juneniles: implication for prevention. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry and allied disciplines 2010; 51(4):472-96.
  34. Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1996; 28(1):1-11.
  35. Beak AT, steer RA, Brown Gk. Beck Depression Inventory for measuring depression. San Antonio 1996; 78(2):490-8.
  36. Fata L, Birashk B, Atefvahid MK, Dabson KS. Meaning assignment structures/ schema, emotional states and cognitive processing of emotional information: comparing two conceptual frameworks. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology 2003; 11(3):312-26. [In Persian].
  37. Dozois DG, Dobson KS, Ahnberg JL. A psychomertic evaluation of the beck depression inventory-ii. Psychological Assesment 1998; 10(2):83-9.
  38. Smarr KL, Keefer AL. Measures of depression and depressive symptoms: Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (Suppl 11):S453-66.
  39. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988; 56(6):893-7.
  40. Jackson CJ. Jackson-5 scales of revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST) and their application to dysfunctional real world outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality 2009; 43(4):556-69.
  41. Hasani J, Salehi S, Azad MR. Psychometric properties of Jackson’s five factor questionnaire: scales of revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST). Journal of Research in psychological Health 2012; 6(3):60-73. [In Persian].
  42. Fayazi M, Hasani J. Structural relations between brain-behavioral systems, social anxiety, depression and internet addiction: with regard to revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (r-RST). Comput Human Behav 2017; 72:441-8.
  43. Li Y, Xu Y, Chen Z. Effects of the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS), Behavioral Activation System (BAS), and emotion regulation on depression: a one-year follow-up study in Chinese adolescents. Psychiatry Res 2015; 230(2):287-93.
  44. Gray JA. Neurobiology of learning, emotion and affect. New York: Raven Press; 1991.
  45. Takahashi Y, Roberts BW, Yamagata S, Kijima N. Personality traits show differential relations with anxiety and depression in a nonclinical sample. Psychologia 2015; 58(1):15-26.
  46. Struijs SY, Lamers F, Vroling MS, Roelofs K, Spinhoven P, Penninx BW. Approach and avoidance tendencies in depression and anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Res 2017; 256:475-81.
  47. Gable SL, Reis HT, Elliot AJ. Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000; 78(6):1135-49.
  48. Corr PJ. Anxiety: splitting the phenomenological atom. Pers Individ Dif 2011; 50(7):889-97.
  49. Ly C. The relevance of reinforcement sensitivity theory to social anxiety and response to cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder [dissertation]. Tasmania, Australian: University of Tasmania; 2011.
  50. Mellick W, Sharp C, Alfano C. The role of BIS/BAS in the vulnerability for depression in adolescent girls. Pers Individ Dif 2014; 69:17-21.
  51. Hewig J, Hagemann D, Seifert J, Naumann E, Bartussek D. The relation of cortical activity and BIS/BAS on the trait level. Biol Psychol 2006; 71(1):42-53.
  52. Walkup JT, Albano A, Piacentini J, Birmaher B, Compton SN, Sherrill JT, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy, sertraline, or a combination in childhood anxiety. N Engl J Med 2008; 359(26):2753-66.
  53. Levita L, Bois C, Healey A, Smyllie E, Papakonstantinou E, Hartley T, et al. The behavioural inhibition system, anxiety and hippocampal volume in a non-clinical population. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord 2014; 4(1):4.
  54. Pourmohammad-Rezai-Tajrishi M, Mirzamani-Bafghi M. The relationship between the activity of brain-behavioral systems, social support and depression. Social Welfare Quarterly 2007; 7(26):223-46. [In Persian].
  55. Mansuri A, Bakhshipour Roudsari A. Relationship between behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems with pathological and non-pathological worries. Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences 2010; 12(1):59-64 [In Persian].
  56. Basharpour S, Mozafari S. The role of behavioral activation/inhibition systems inprediction of the state/trait anxiety in high school students. Journal of School Psychology 2014; 3(4):158-66. [In Persian].
  57. Karsazi H, Hashemi Nosratabad T. Structural relationship of brain - behavior systems and difficulty in regulation with social anxiety disorder and depression. Journal of Thought & Behavior in Clinical Psychology 2015; 10(37):77-89. [In Persian].
  58. Spielberg JM, Heller W, Silton RL, Stewart JL, Miller GA. Approach and avoidance profiles distinguish dimensions of anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research 2011; 35(4):359-71.
Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Volume 25, Issue 4
July and August 2018
Pages 328-338

Home

Editorial Board

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us