Document Type : Short Communication

Authors

1 Digestive Medicine in Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Physiology Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Background: The results reported on the prevalence of colorectal cancer are very disturbing. This study aimed to address the polyps’ detection rate and their prevalence. In addition, we analyzed some related variables among the patients referred to Afzalipour and Mehregan Hospitals of Kerman in 2015-2016.
Methods: Data concerning colonoscopy and pathologic samples of patients aged over 40 years who referred for colonoscopy were collected and analyzed. The polyps’ detection rate and some related variables were assessed.
Results: A total of 469 patients older than 40 who underwent colonoscopy were enrolled in this study. One hundred and two cases of polyps were found in which 45.3% of them had adenoma. The bowel preparation (0.03), higher age (0.007) and male gender (0.013) had significant relationship with the detection of polyps.
Conclusion: The detection of the polyp / adenoma in this study is comparable with the results of the research carried out in other parts of the world with a high prevalence of colon cancer. Our findings are consistent with other studies in Iran as well.

Keywords

  1. Karimi Zarchi AA, Saadat AR, Jalalian HR, Esmaeili M. Epidemiology and survival analysis of colorectal cancer and its related factors. Kowsar Medical Journal 2011; 15 (4):239-43. [In Persian].
  2. Akhoond MR, Kazemnejad A, Hajizadeh E, GAnbary Motlagh A, Zali MR. Comparison of influential factors affecting survival of patients with colon and rectum cancer using competing risks model. Koomesh 2010; 12(2):119-28. [In Persian].
  3. Asghari Jafarabadi M, Hajizadeh E, Kazemnejad A, Fatemi SR. Recognition of the factors affecting survival in colon and rectal cancer patients referred to RCGLD center of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences: accelerated failure time parametric survival analysis with frailty. Journal of Shahrekord Uuniversity of Medical Sciences 2010; 12(2):51-64. [In Persian].
  4. Akbari ME, Abachizadeh K, Ghanbari Motlagh A, Khayamzadeh M, Asna Ashri F, Majd Jabbari Z. Cancer in Iran. Tehran: Dar-al-fekr; 2009. [In Persian].
  5. Mahadev S, Green PH, Lebwohl B. Rates of suboptimal preparation for colonoscopy differ markedly between providers: impact on adenoma detection rates. J Clin Gastroenterol 2015; 49(9):746-50.
  6. Salimzadeh H, Delavari A, Montazeri A, Mirzazadeh A. Knowledge and practice of iranians toward colorectal cancer, and barriers to screening. Int J Prev Med 2012; 3(1):29-35.
  7. Hsieh YH, Tseng CW, Hu CT, Koo M, Leung FW. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflation. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86(1):192-201.
  8. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362(19):1795-803.
  9. Kim HS, Baik SJ, Kim KH, Oh CR, Lee SI. Prevalence and risk factors of colorectal adenoma in 14,932 Koreans screening undergoing colonoscopy. Korean J Gastroenterol 2013; 62(2):104-10.
  10. Gupta A, Samadder J, Elliott E, Sethi S, Schoenfeld P. Prevalence of adenomas and advanced adenomas in patients in the 40- to 49-year age group screening undergoing colonoscopy because of a family history of adenoma / polyp in a first-degree relative. GastrointestEndosc 2012; 75(4):705-11.
  11. Raju GS, Vadyala V, Slack R, Krishna SG, Ross WA, Lynch PM, et al. Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening. Cancer Med 2013; 2(3):391-402.
  12. Delavari A, Bishehsari F, Salimzadeh H, Khosravi P, Delavari F, Nasseri Moghaddam S, et al. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence. BMC Gastroenterol 2014; 14:196.
  13. Bjerregaard NC, Tottrup A, Sorensen HT, Laurberg S. Evaluation of the Danish national strategy for selective use of colonoscopy in symptomatic outpatients without known risk factors for colorectal cancer. Scand J gastroenterol 2007; 42(2):228-36.
  14. Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Ebstein O. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tumor? Gut 2004; 53(2):277-83.
  15. Betes M, Munoz-Navas MA, Duque JM, Angos R, Macias E, Subtil JC, et al. Use of colonoscopy as a primary screening test for colorectal cancer in average risk people. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98(12):2648-54.
  16. Huppe D, Lemberg L, Felten G. Effectiveness and patient tolerance of screening colonoscopy- first results. Z Gastroenterol 2004; 42(7):591-8. [In German].
  17. Sharifi Dalouei D, Akhlaghi M. Review of 145 patients with gastrointestinal polyps of Ghaem Medical Center, Mashhad. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2000; 43(69):25-32. [In Persian].
  18. 18. Rahbar N, Molanai S, Khatibzadeh N. Examining the correlation between adenomatous colorectal polyps with different grade of dysplasia and their distribution in the large intestine, Milad Hospital, 2001-2004.      Medical Sciences Journal of Islamic Azad University 2005; 15(2):63-9. [In Perisan].
  19. PatelK, Hoffman NE. The anatomical distribution of colorectal polyps at colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 33(3):222-5.
  20. BafandehY, DaghestaniD, EsmailiH. Demographic and anatomical survey of colorectal polyps in an Iranian population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2005; 6(4):537-40.
  21. Bafandeh Y, Khoshbaten M, Eftekhar Sadat AT, Farhang S. Clinical predictors of colorectal polyps and carcinoma in a low prevalence region: results of a colonoscopy based study. World JGastroenterol 2008; 14(10):1534-8.
  22. Khodadoostan M, Fatemi R, Maserat E, Mohammad Alizade AH, Molaei M, Mashaiekhy R, et al. Clinical and pathology characteristics of colorectal polyps in Iranian population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2010; 11(2):557-60.
  23. Taghipour Zahir S, Binesh F, Hashemian F, Hakimi A. Demographic survey of colorectal polyps in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran. Rawal Medical Journal 2010; 35(1):31-33.
  24. da Rocha Torres Neto J, Arcieri JS, Teixeira FR. Epidemiological aspects of colorectal polyps and flat adenomas. Revista Brasileira de Coloproctologia 2010; 30(4):419-29.
  25. Agah SH, Ghasemi A, Rezaei M, Ashayeri N, Fereshtehnejad SM, Mohammad Sadeghi H. Frequency determination of polyps and colorectal tumors among patients who underwent colonoscopy in Shariati hospital between November 2000- November 2002 Tehran. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences 2008; 15(60-61):13-8. [In Persian].
  26. Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 1979; 190(6):679-83.
  27. Exbrayat C, Poncet F, Billette de Villemeur A, Garnier A, Bureau du Colombier P. Colonoscopy practices and colorectal cancer and polyp screening, as assessed in the French district of Isère from May to July in 2004. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2010; 34(12):702-11.
  28. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Douben CA, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1298-1306.
  29. Deng B, Zhi J, Chen Y, liang L, Wu J, Gao X, et al. The impact of colonoscopy quality control table on adenoma detection rates. Gastrointestinal Res Pract 2016; 2016:2548109.
  30. 30.Kawamura T, Oda Y, Kobayashi K, Matsuda K, Kida M, Tanaka K, et al. Colonoscopy withdrawal time and adenoma detection rate: a Japanese multicenter analysis. Journal of Gastroentrology and Hepatology Research 2017; 6(1)2273-78.