Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

Abstract

Background: Microencapsulation of probiotics can be used to increase their viability during the process and delivery to target areas in the gut and intestinal tract. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of microencapsulation on viability of probiotics bacteria (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobactrium animalis subs lactis) in bile salt solution and simulated gastrointestinal juice conditions.
Methods: First, 1 gram of probiotic bacteria was mixed in 100 ml of MRS broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 h until bacteria were activated. Microencapsulation of probiotics with sodium alginate/resistant starch and sodium alginate/chitosan were done by extrusion method. The number of viable bacteria was evaluated in bile salt solution (0.6%, w/v) and simulated gastric juice (0.08 mol/L HCl solution contained 0.2% NaCL and pH: 1.55 without pepsin), followed by incubation in simulated intestinal juice (0.05 mol/L KH2PO4 solution with 0.6 % bile salts and pH: 7.43).
Results: The microencapsulation could successfully and significantly protect probiotic bacteria against adverse condition of simulated human gastro-intestinal condition. Microcapsules containing sodium alginate/resistant starch had the highest survival rate at the end of the incubation time in bile salt solution (6.3±0.2 × 106 and 4.6±0.3 × 107 for Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis, respectively) and simulated gastrointestinal condition (4.5±0.4 × 107 and 1.7±0.2 × 106 for Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis, respectively).
Conclusion: Generally, the microencapsulation process improved the survival of probiotic bacteria under simulated gastrointestinal conditions and bile salts solution and in this case, sodium alginate / resistant starch coating was more effective than sodium alginate/ chitosan.

Keywords

  1. Kailasapathy K, Encapsulation technologies for functional foods and nutraceutical product development. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources. 2009; 4(33):1-19. doi: 1079/PAVSNNR20094033.
  2. Krasaekoopt W, Bhandari B, Deeth H. Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yoghurt. Int Dairy J. 2003; 13(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00155-3.
  3. Picot A, Lacroix C. Encapsulation of bifidobacteria in whey protein-based microcapsules and survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt. Int Dairy J. 2004; 14(6):505-15. doi: 10.1016/j.
    2003.10.008.
  4. Ding W, Shah N. Acid, bile, and heat tolerance of free and microencapsulated probiotic bacteria. J Food Sci. 2007; 72(9):446-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00565.x.
  5. Mortazavian A, Azizi A, Ehsani M, Razavi S, Mousavi S, Sohrabvandi S, et al. Survival of encapsulated probiotic bacteria in Iranian yogurt drink (Doogh) after the product exposure to simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Milchwissenschaft. 2008; 63(4):349-472.
  6. Gouin S. Microencapsulation: industrial appraisal of existing technologies and trends. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2004; 15(7-8):330-47. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.
    10.005.
  7. Chavarri M, Maranon I, Ares R, Ibanez FC, Marzo F, Villaran Mdel C. Microencapsulation of a probiotic and prebiotic in alginate-chitosan capsules improves survival in simulated gastro-intestinal Int J Food Microbiol. 2010; 142(1-2):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.022.
  8. Calinoiu LF, Ştefanescu BE, Pop ID, Muntean L, Vodnar DC. Chitosan coating applications in probiotic microencapsulation. Coatings. 2019; 9(3):194. doi: 10.3390/coatings9030194.
  9. Sultana K, Godward G, Reynolds N, Arumugaswamy R, Peiris P, Kailasapathy K. Encapsulation of probiotic bacteria with alginate-starch and evaluation of survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions and in yoghurt. Int J Food Microbiol. 2000; 62(1-2):47-55. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(00)
    00380-9.
  10. Mirzaei H, Pourjafar H, Homayouni A. Effect of calcium alginate and resistant starch microencapsulation on the survival rate of Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and sensory properties in Iranian white brined cheese. Food Chem. 2012; 132(4):1966-70. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.12.033.
  11. Krasaekoopt W, Bhandari B, Deeth H. The influence of coating materials on some properties of alginate beads and survivability of microencapsulated probiotic bacteria. Int Dairy J. 2004;1 4(8):737-43. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.01.004.
  12. Tharmaraj N, Shah NP. Selective enumeration of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and propionibacteria. J Dairy Sci. 2003; 86(7):2288-96. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73821-1.
  13. Faye T, Tamburello A, Vegarud GE, Skeie S. Survival of lactic acid bacteria from fermented milks in an in vitro digestion model exploiting sequential incubation in human gastric and duodenum juice. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95(2):558-66. doi: 10.3168/jds.
    2011-4705.
  14. Ishizuka A, Tomizuka K, Aoki R, Nishijima T, Saito Y, Inoue R, Ushida K, Mawatari T, Ikeda T. Effects of administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis GCL2505 on defecation frequency and bifidobacterial microbiota composition in humans. J Biosci Bioeng. 2012; 113(5):587-91. doi: 10.1016/
    jbiosc.2011.12.016.
  15. Lotfi H, Hejazi M. Maleki zanjani B, Barzegari A. Isolation, Biochemical and Molecular Identification of Potentiallly Probiotic Bacteria from Traditional Dairy Products from Heris and Sarab Regions. Food Research. 2010; 3(1):1-17. [ In Persian].
  16. Hassanzadazar H, Ehsani A, Mardani K, Hesari J. Investigation of antibacterial, acid and bile tolerance properties of lactobacilli isolated from Koozeh cheese. Vet Res Forum. 2012; 3‌(3):181-5. PMID: 25610566.
  17. Ziar H, Gerard P, Riazi A. Calcium alginate-resistant starch mixed gel improved the survival of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis Bb12 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus LBRE-LSAS in yogurt and simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Food Sci Technol. 2012; 47(2):1421-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.02989.x.
  18. Etchepare MA, Raddatz G, de Moraes Flores EM, Zepka LQ, Jacob-Lopes E, Barin JS, et al. Effect of resistant starch and chitosan on survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus microencapsulated with sodium alginate. Food Sci Technol. 2016; 65:511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.08.039.
  19. Chandramouli V, Kailasapathy K, Peiris P, Jones M. An improved method of microencapsulation and its evaluation to protect Lactobacillus spp. in simulated gastric conditions. J Microbiol Methods. 2004; 56(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2003.09.002.
  20. Mandal S, Puniya A, Singh K. Effect of alginate concentrations on survival of microencapsulated Lactobacillus casei NCDC-298. Int Dairy J. 2006; 16(10):1190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.005
  21. Brinques GB, Ayub MAZ. Effect of microencapsulation on survival of Lactobacillus plantarum in simulated gastrointestinal conditions, refrigeration, and yogurt. J Food Eng. 2011; 103(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.
    2010.10.006.
  22. Krasaekoopt W, Bhandari B, Deeth HC. Survival of probiotics encapsulated in chitosan-coated alginate beads in yoghurt from UHT-and conventionally treated milk during storage. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2006; 39(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2004.12.006.
  23. Sabikhi L, Babu R, Thompkinson DK, Kapila S. Resistance of microencapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus LA1 to processing treatments and simulated gut conditions. Food Bioprocess Tech. 2010; 3(4):586-93. doi:10.1007/s11947-008-0135-1.
  24. Anal AK, Singh H. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007; 18(5):240-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs. 2007.01.004.
  25. Shahdadi F, Mirzaie H, Kashaninejad M, Khomeiri M, Ziaiifar AM, Akbarian A. The Effect of Drinking Yoghurt Containing Free and Microencapsulated Probiotic Bacteria on Changes of the Population of These Bacteria in the Digestive System. J Kerman Univ Medical Sci. 2015; 22(6): 592-601.