Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences

Travel Prevention Using Telepsychiatric Services: A Review

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

Sadrieh Hajesmaeel-Gohari 1
Sareh Keshvardoost 1
Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy 2

1 Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 Modeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

https://doi.org/10.34172/jkmu.2022.61
Abstract
Background: Telepsychiatry is a type of mental health service delivery using information and communication technology for patients living far from psychiatrists It can reduce the number of travelers looking for mental health services. This study aimed to review articles that reported the percentage of prevented travels or referrals using telepsychiatry.
Methods: The PubMed database was searched in September 2019 for this review study. Data were extracted from admitted studies based on a series of variables consisting of author, country, modality, referral setting, urgency, study design, sample size, and percentage of prevented travel. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data.
Results: Eight studies were included. Half of these studies were conducted in Australia. Real-time telepsychiatry modality was used in most of the studies (75%). The hospital was the most referral setting in the studies (62.5%). The type of telepsychiatry services delivered in 75% of the studies was elective. The study design of 62.5% of studies was prospective. The number of included participants in the studies ranged from 28 to 1943. The percentage of avoided travels ranged from 12 to 79.
Conclusion: Successful telepsychiatry systems could prevent unnecessary referrals and travels. However, the effective use of telepsychiatry services depends on various factors, including the type and period of the disease, the therapist’s efficacy in terms of correct diagnosis and treatment, and patient cooperation.

Keywords

Telemedicine
Telepsychiatry
Travel
Referral
Prevent
Review
1. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C,
Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence,
prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases
and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a
systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study
2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789-858. doi: 10.1016/
s0140-6736(18)32279-7.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Mental Health Atlas
2017. Geneva: WHO; 2018. Available from: https://www.
who.int/mental_health/evidence/atlas/mental_health_
atlas_2017/en/.
3. Schubert NJ, Backman PJ, Bhatla R, Corace KM. Telepsychiatry
and patient-provider concordance. Can J Rural Med.
2019;24(3):75-82. doi: 10.4103/cjrm.cjrm_9_18.
4. Mazhari S, Ghaffari Nejad A, Mofakhami O, Raaii F,
Bahaadinbeigy K. Evaluating the diagnostic agreement
between telepsychiatry assessment and face-to-face visit: a
preliminary study. Iran J Psychiatry. 2019;14(3):236-41.
5. Hubley S, Lynch SB, Schneck C, Thomas M, Shore J.
Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes. World J Psychiatry.
2016;6(2):269-82. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i2.269.
6. Das S, Manjunatha N, Kumar CN, Math SB, Thirthalli J.
Tele-psychiatric after care clinic for the continuity of care:
a pilot study from an academic hospital. Asian J Psychiatr.
2020;48:101886. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.101886.
7. Roberts N, Hu T, Axas N, Repetti L. Child and adolescent
emergency and urgent mental health delivery through
telepsychiatry: 12-month prospective study. Telemed J E
Health. 2017;23(10):842-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0269.
8. Li H, Glecia A, Kent-Wilkinson A, Leidl D, Kleib M, Risling T.
Transition of mental health service delivery to telepsychiatry
in response to COVID-19: a literature review. Psychiatr Q.
2022;93(1):181-97. doi: 10.1007/s11126-021-09926-7.
9. Di Carlo F, Sociali A, Picutti E, Pettorruso M, Vellante F,
Verrastro V, et al. Telepsychiatry and other cutting-edge
technologies in COVID-19 pandemic: bridging the distance in
mental health assistance. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(1):10.1111/
ijcp.13716. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13716.
10. Bahaadinbeigy K, Yogesan K, Wootton R. MEDLINE versus
EMBASE and CINAHL for telemedicine searches. Telemed J E
Health. 2010;16(8):916-9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0046.
11. Reliford A, Adebanjo B. Use of telepsychiatry in pediatric
emergency room to decrease length of stay for psychiatric
patients, improve resident on-call burden, and reduce
factors related to physician burnout. Telemed J E Health.
2019;25(9):828-32. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0124.
12. Buckley D, Weisser S. Videoconferencing could reduce
the number of mental health patients transferred from
outlying facilities to a regional mental health unit. Aust N
Z J Public Health. 2012;36(5):478-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-
6405.2012.00915.x.
13. Saurman E, Perkins D, Roberts R, Roberts A, Patfield M, Lyle
D. Responding to mental health emergencies: implementation
of an innovative telehealth service in rural and remote new
South Wales, Australia. J Emerg Nurs. 2011;37(5):453-9. doi:
10.1016/j.jen.2010.11.005.
14. Worth JL, Stern TA. Benefits of an outpatient psychiatric
teleconsultation unit: results of a 1-year pilot. Prim Care
Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;5(2):80-4. doi: 10.4088/
pcc.v05n0204.
15. D’Souza R. Telemedicine for intensive support of psychiatric
Hajesmaeel-Gohari et al
506 Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Volume 29, Number 5, 2022
inpatients admitted to local hospitals. J Telemed Telecare.
2000;6 Suppl 1:S26-8. doi: 10.1258/1357633001934834.
16. Trott P, Blignault I. Cost evaluation of a telepsychiatry service
in northern Queensland. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4 Suppl
1:66-8. doi: 10.1258/1357633981931515.
17. Wootton R, Bahaadinbeigy K, Hailey D. Estimating travel
reduction associated with the use of telemedicine by patients
and healthcare professionals: proposal for quantitative
synthesis in a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res.
2011;11:185. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-185.
18. Hajesmaeel-Gohari S, Keshvardoost S, Ershad-Sarabi R,
Bahaadinbeigy K. Travel avoidance using telepediatric
by patients and healthcare providers: a review of the
literature. Acta Inform Med. 2020;28(2):124-9. doi: 10.5455/
aim.2020.28.124-129.
19. Hilty DM, Parish MB, Chan S, Torous J, Xiong G,
Yellowlees PM. A comparison of in-person, synchronous
and asynchronous telepsychiatry: skills/competencies,
teamwork, and administrative workflow. J Technol Behav Sci.
2020;5(3):273-88. doi: 10.1007/s41347-020-00137-8.
20. Chipps J, Brysiewicz P, Mars M. Effectiveness and feasibility
of telepsychiatry in resource constrained environments?
A systematic review of the evidence. Afr J Psychiatry
(Johannesbg). 2012;15(4):235-43. doi: 10.4314/ajpsy.
v15i4.30.
21. Australian Digital Health Agency. Australia’s National Digital
Health Strategy 2017. https://www.digitalhealth.gov.au/.
Accessed September 4, 2020.
Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences
Volume 29, Issue 5
September and October 2022
Pages 502-506

Home

Editorial Board

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Guide for Reviewers

Contact Us