Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Physiology Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology; Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Kerman, Iran

2 Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

3 Cardiovascular Research Center, Institute of Basic and Clinical Physiology Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Kerman, Iran

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has caused limitations, in patients’ accessibility in clinical and research settings. We sought whether telenutrition could be applied interchangeably with face-to-face interview for dietary intake assessment by 24-hour recall in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Sixty-eight females with T2DM aged 50-55 years were enrolled randomly in a descriptive-analytic cross-sectional study. The patients completed three consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls. The first one was a face-to-face interview, and the subsequent two recalls were conducted by telephone call. The total energy and 18 selected nutrients intake were calculated for the three interviews.
Results: The mean (±SD) age of participants was 53.97±2.14 years. The face-to-face interview resulted in significantly higher total energy and 18 selected nutrients intake than the two telenutrition interviews (P value range: 0.031 - 0.001). No significant differences were found between the data provided from the two telenutrition interviews.
Conclusion: Telenutrition underreports and underestimates the total energy and nutrient intakes compared with the face-to-face interview in the 24-hour dietary recall. Therefore, it cannot be recommended to be applied interchangeably with a face-to-face interview for dietary intake assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in patients whose nutrition assessment is of clinical importance. A combination of the two methods using new communication applications (e.g. WhatsApp) may cover the defects of telenutrition method.
 

Highlights

Mohammad Reza Mahmood(Google scholar)(Pubmed)

 

 

Keywords

  1. Franz MJ, Bantle JP, Beebe CA, Brunzell JD, Chiasson JL, Garg A, et al. Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications. Diabetes Care. 2003;26 Suppl 1:S51-61. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s51.
  2. Shim JS, Oh K, Kim HC. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol Health. 2014;36:e2014009. doi: 10.4178/epih/e2014009.
  3. Casey PH, Goolsby SL, Lensing SY, Perloff BP, Bogle ML. The use of telephone interview methodology to obtain 24-hour dietary recalls. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999;99(11):1406-11. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(99)00340-5.
  4. Shah ND, Krupinski EA, Bernard J, Moyer MF. The evolution and utilization of telehealth in ambulatory nutrition practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021;36(4):739-49. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10641.
  5. Brunton C, Arensberg MB, Drawert S, Badaracco C, Everett W, McCauley SM. Perspectives of registered dietitian nutritionists on adoption of telehealth for nutrition care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(2):235. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020235.
  6. Fox TA, Heimendinger J, Block G. Telephone surveys as a method for obtaining dietary information: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992;92(6):729-32.
  7. Lyu LC, Hankin JH, Liu LQ, Wilkens LR, Lee JH, Goodman MT, et al. Telephone vs face-to-face interviews for quantitative food frequency assessment. J Am Diet Assoc. 1998;98(1):44- 8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(98)00013-3.
  8. Nucera E, Rizzi A, Chini R, Giangrossi S, Lohmeyer FM, Parrinello G, et al. Diet intervention study through telemedicine assistance for systemic nickel allergy syndrome patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2897. doi: 10.3390/nu13082897.
  9. McKenzie DC, Johnson RK, Harvey-Berino J, Gold BC. Impact of interviewer’s body mass index on underreporting energy intake in overweight and obese women. Obes Res. 2002;10(6):471-7. doi: 10.1038/oby.2002.65.
  10. Tran KM, Johnson RK, Soultanakis RP, Matthews DE. Inperson vs telephone-administered multiple-pass 24-hour recalls in women: validation with doubly labeled water. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000;100(7):777-83. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 8223(00)00227-3.
  11. Briefel RR, Sempos CT, McDowell MA, Chien S, Alaimo K. Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(4 Suppl):1203S-9S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/65.4.1203S.
  12. Chittleborough CR, Taylor AW, Baum FE, Hiller JE. Nonresponse to a life course socioeconomic position indicator in surveillance: comparison of telephone and face-toface modes. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-54.
  13. Janssen PM, Visser NA, Dorhout Mees SM, Klijn CJ, Algra A, Rinkel GJ. Comparison of telephone and face-to-face assessment of the modified Rankin Scale. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29(2):137-9. doi: 10.1159/000262309.
  14. Kuzmar IE, Cortés-Castell E, Rizo M. Effectiveness of telenutrition in a women’s weight loss program. PeerJ. 2015;3:e748. doi: 10.7717/peerj.748.
  15. Mahmoodi MR, Najafipour H, Mohsenpour MA, Amiri M. The relationship between food insecurity with cardiovascular risk markers and metabolic syndrome components in patients with diabetes: a population-based study from Kerman coronary artery disease risk study. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:118. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_12_17.
  16. Szolnoki G, Hoffmann D. Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research. Wine Econ Policy. 2013;2(2):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.wep.2013.10.001.
  17. Sturges JE, Hanrahan KJ. Comparing telephone and faceto-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2004;4(1):107-18. doi: 10.1177/1468794104041110.
  18. Brustad M, Skeie G, Braaten T, Slimani N, Lund E. Comparison of telephone vs face-to-face interviews in the assessment of dietary intake by the 24 h recall EPIC SOFT program--the Norwegian calibration study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57(1):107- 13. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601498.
  19. Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health (Oxf). 2005;27(3):281-91. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi031.
  20. Uzzaman MN, Jackson T, Uddin A, Rowa-Dewar N, Chisti MJ, Habib GMM, et al. Continuing professional education for general practitioners on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: feasibility of a blended learning approach in Bangladesh. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):203. doi: 10.1186/ s12875-020-01270-2.
  21. Park HY, Kwon YM, Jun HR, Jung SE, Kwon SY. Satisfaction survey of patients and medical staff for telephone-based telemedicine during hospital closing due to COVID-19 transmission. Telemed J E Health. 2021;27(7):724-32. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0369.